Understanding the Criminalisation of Wage Theft: The New Framework
A key aspect of the Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 is the criminalisation of ‘wage theft’....
Mediation is a facilitative process which is included in the mandatory dispute resolution process set out in the Franchising Code.
In any franchise dispute the franchisor and the franchisee must comply with the dispute resolution procedures set out in the Franchising Code of Conduct (the Franchising Code) and the Franchise Agreement.
The two mandatory dispute resolution processes set out in the Franchising Code are mediation and conciliation.
In mediation, the mediator assists the parties to:
The mediator does not provide advice or make any determinations about the dispute.
Under Part 4 of the Franchising Code - Resolving Disputes, a party to a franchise agreement (known as the complainant) who has a dispute with another party to the franchise agreement (known as the respondent), may take action either under:
If the complainant decides to take action under the complaint handling procedure set out in the Franchising Code, the complainant must first issue a Notice of Dispute.
The Franchising Code provides that the complaintant must tell the respondent in writing (the Notice of Dispute):
(a) the nature of the dispute;
(b) what outcome the complainant wants; and
(c) what action the complainant thinks will resolve the dispute.
The parties should then try to agree how to resolve the dispute, but if they cannot agree within 3 weeks either party may refer the matter to mediation or conciliation.
We set out below the process if the parties decide to refer the matter to mediation.
The mediator will usually contact each party and arrange a separate preliminary conference.
The purpose of the preliminary conference is to:
There may be a follow up to the preliminary conference, for example if documentation is not exchanged as agreed. Documentation may include the documents that each party is relying on in the dispute. Documentation may also include a position paper, where each party sets out their "position" in relation to the franchise dispute.
On the day of the mediation, the mediator may meet separately with each of the parties and their representatives before the mediation starts.
This will enable the mediator to set the tone for the day and to gauge the attitude of the respective parties.
After the parties have met separately with the mediator, the mediator will begin the formal proceedings.
The mediator’s opening statement will normally cover the following issues:
The mediator’s role is to facilitate. The mediator does not impose decisions upon the parties, but is there to assist the parties to reach an agreement.
After the mediator's opening statement, each party will have the opportunity to explain its position (without interruption from the other party). This is known as the party's opening statement.
At the end of each of the respective party’s opening statements, the mediator may summarise the key issues raised by the party.
After the parties have each completed their opening statements, in addition to summarising the key issues, the mediator may list an agenda of issues for discussion.
The mediator may also prioritise those issues in the order that the parties wish to deal with them.
If the parties are comfortable in attending a joint session together, they will discuss the issues summarised by the mediator or set out in the agenda, in what is known as a "joint session".
During the joint sesstion the mediator should use his or her skills as a facilitator to
It is likely that after the joint session, the parties will separate into separate rooms.
The mediator may spend time privately with each party exploring the issues and reality testing each party’s position.
The mediator will not discuss the matters raised in a private session with the other party unless they are specifically authorised to do so.
This is generally the stage of the mediation where the parties start exploring the options for settlement.
If the franchise dispute settles at mediation, the mediator will ensure that any oral agreement reached between the parties is accurately reflected in a written agreement or heads of agreement.
It is generally good practice that if the dispute is settled, the parties enter into a written agreement or heads of agreement on the day of mediation.
If the parties do not enter into a written agreement or heads of agreement on the day of the mediation, there is a risk that a party will change its position and the matter will not settle.
Disclaimer
The information in this article is general in nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any person or other entity. Although we do our best to provide timely and accurate information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
A key aspect of the Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 is the criminalisation of ‘wage theft’....
Copyright © 2021 Haarsma Lawyers